My last post for Module 7 on Composition was about rules for composing great photos, but there are times when you should ignore the rules ( well some of them) and experiment with creative shots like intentional blur to get a painterly impressionist image or abstract photography
Rules that can be broken
- Rule: The Rule of Thirds
- Rule: Fill The Frame to Draw Focus on the Subject
- Rule:Leading Lines
- Rule: Shoot With the Sun Behind You.
- Rule: Avoid Shooting Portraits at Midday.
- Rule: Blur is Bad
- Rule: Keep Your Horizons Strait
- Rule: Never Shoot From Behind Your Subject



There’s a great article on National Geographic on breaking the rules and I encourage it for further reading
ttps://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/photo-tips/breaking-the-rules
Activity 7.2: Breaking the rules
Ok, now it’s time to break the rules.
For this activity, pick 2-3 ‘rules’ of composition and capture a series of images that deliberately break them.
Analyse the results. Did they work or not? If so, why? If not, why not?
The Results
I chose to create a series of intentionally blurred images with crowd movement as I really like the impressionist/abstract painting look. Heres two that i shot around Parramatta CBD

As the world go by
Sometimes intentionally blurring a subject doesn’t work, long exposures during the day can be destroyed by too much light into the camera, or it just looks badly wrong and not artistic, this can be overcome with ND filters and UV filters, by putting tape on the viewfinder and using live view to focus.
With parts of architecture it can look weird focusing on one aspect of a building if the shot is badly composed. Just because your breaking rules doesn’t mean you can, not compose the image in a visually pleasing way.